Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Replicator?


Imagine a future where energy is limitless and free. A world where because of the advances in science we control fusion to get our energy. No one fights about energy resources anymore because we have key power plants placed in places that power the entire globe evenly and thoroughly.

Now that we have the setting, in this world goods would no longer be manufactured or produced. They would be designed and tested. Then they would be replicated. Each building would have a replicator and each building would have a store of matter. No one would actually purchase products any more, they would pay for the rights to replicate products. They would be paying for the architecture of the products. Once the architecture is purchased by the consumer they have the rights to replicate it as many times as that purchase contract allows. if science advances far enough ways of taking raw energy and transforming it straight into forms of matter would prove more efficient. However that does not seem likely to happen for a while.

Imagine a hospital equipped with this kind of technology. Instant vaccines, medicines, and supplies. Would save millions of lives. Imagine a replicator placed in a small town in Africa, now able to replicate food and water. It would change how we live. No longer would the population be dependent on the earth for it's survival. No longer would people be forced to die because their region experienced a drought, disease or disaster.

Where would we get all the material for this from? Well if we are powering the world by fusion then there is the answer. We use the leftover matter from the fusion reactions to be used in the replication processes.

Is this technology even close to being possible? We have the technology For 3 dimensional printers right now. People use them to test a multitude of things in the real world. All we would need to do is modify this process to account for density and different types of materials. When it comes to fusion, even though they always say it is 50 years away, eventually we will possess the technology to control a reaction and obtain the energy from those reactions.

The world would be saved from overproduction, and the carbon foot print for moving products around the world reduced to almost nothing. The resources spent in packaging products would also be reduced to almost nothing and the garbage produced from those packaging would be reduced to almost nothing. Overnight the worlds waste would decrease substantially and we would finally be able to feed the billions that go hungry everyday.

(picture source)

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Sleep?




I can not even begin to count the amount of nights I have laid awake at night wondering why sleep is such a hard thing to come by, or better yet why It is even necessary. The reasons for it are obvious though. The brain needs some downtime to repair and maintain itself. The thing that gets me all interested in it is why it was evolutionarily weaves into every animal on the planet.

The cause is probably as simple as the fact that since it gets dark at night the body might as well have a resting period due to the fact that there is no way of seeing the world around them. Not until very recently when homo sapiens discovered they could harness energy and illuminate the nighttime for their own wills, no other creature was able to fully take advantage of all 24 hours of the day. Which begs the question, could we systematically reduce our sleeping periods to a fraction of what they once were?

The thing that bugs me about the whole sleep thing is that it does not seem evolutionarily prudent. I would think that any animal that decides to lay down for 8 hours un-moving and un-aware of its surroundings would have died out a long time ago. A sleeping animal would be easy pickings to any fortunate predator that may stumble upon them. Even that did not stop sleep from continuing to be a huge part of an animals cycles.

Probably the most irritating thing about sleep is that it is not an instant thing. One must almost chase it down and overtake it, or at least that is what it feels like sometimes. The brain has to wait until the heart rate and breathing are a certain reduced speed before the process can begin. It is almost painful having to wait for the body to decide it is ready for sleep when the person had decided on that fact hours beforehand.

I wonder if on planets in other systems where they are gravitationally locked into their rotation, one side of the planet always in darkness and one in light. That if those twilight zone animals require sleep or if it has even come to exist in their ecosystem. If sleep originated due to the dark nights here on earth, what would happen if on that planet it was always daytime? Would animals that were never unable to sense their surroundings have come to a point where sleep is required?

I think one of the goals of future bioengineers should be to either find a way for the brain to do the processes it does while sleeping on the fly, or at the very least reduce the required time for sleep. A world without sleep would be a much more efficient place.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad